August 6th, 2008 : Free WiFi

If there is one thing I hate when traveling it is trying to find access to the Internet. It seems that no one offers free Internet for customers or visiters, but will gladly charge you hansomely for a few hours of access.

Recently, on a family vacation to the North Shore of Lake Superior, my domain name expired. I knew it was going to expire soon, but I thought I still had a few weeks because I had been ignoring the spam like emails that MyDomain was sending out every few days for the last two months. (Side note, I don’t see the point of renewing a domain name 60 days ahead of schedule, so stop bloody bugging me about it!)

Anyway, two days after my domain name expired I was in the town of Grand Marais, MN. Most of the town us covered by a BorealWireless service. (Which supplies wireless to most of the city, several busineses, and even their library.) Fortunately for me I found an open network called “NETGEAR” and was able to check my email on my iPod Touch. Even more fortunately, I actually read my email from MyDomains which told me I had an expired Domain. (Side note: I don’t trust them to hold onto my credit card info so the auto renew failed.) I was unable to renew my domain via my iPod, but I was able to call and renew my domain for another year.

Okay, so where am I going with this? This incident got me thinking. I don’t want to pay for an hours worth of time so I can spend 30 seconds checking my email to see if there is an emergency. What I would like to see happen can be described in two senarios:

(Mediocre solution) WiFi providers offer a 5 or 10 minute wireless plan for a small fee. Just enough time so you can check in on things. Then, if the need were to arise, the user could buy a longer block of time.

(Better solution) WiFi providers offer a limited 2 or 5 minute free period wherein the user may check in on things and decide if the need to purchase more online time.

Here is a novel idea, rather than charging people an exorbitant fee for a pathetic service, give customers something they are willing to pay for.

April 10th, 2008 : Broken Technology (Finder Search and swf files)

Okay. I just spent the better part of two hours doing something that should have taken me 15 minutes tops.

I had a problem with Finder and I thought I could whip up a short screen cast and put it online in order to vent. I have a free screen recording program, which was getting 2 frames per second, which wasn’t enough, so I decided to try Jing, the other free program I have.

Jing worked nicely, but outputs a swf flash file, which means, no editing, and no uploading to YouTube.

So I spent a good half hour or more searching for a viable means to convert from swf to a movie file that I could edit in say, iMovie or FCP or even Window Movie Maker if need be. Anything so I can trim down the file and put it online.

I tried several programs for Mac and Windows, none of them did what I wanted and were also free. I wouldn’t mind paying for software that did this and did it well, if I knew I was going to be doing this on a regular basis. But I don’t know this, and for a one time use I don’t want to shell out $20 or $40 or $80 for the type of software I would need. Several of the pieces of software that looked promising, either didn’t perform quite as expected, or were even advertised as a “free download” but the programs themselves were not free.

Anyway, I have finally given up. I am entirely sick of technology tonight and thus I have uploaded the unedited version of my complaint to my website, and post a link here (below) for all to see. (It’s about a 6MB file, for those who are bandwidth conscious.)

If anyone has any suggestions for dealing with these type of issues in the future, drop me a line. (And yes, I know buying a decent screen recording program would solve all my issues, but I can’t justify that type of financial purchase at the moment.)

Here is the link: Finder’s Search is Broken.

April 8th, 2008 : A Country’s Music

Several years ago in high school I remember hearing this phrase:

Let me control a country’s music and I will control the country.

At the time I assumed it was a quote, probably from one of the “great” dictators. But after searching all over for it for several years I could not find it. I tried different variations of quote and asked everywhere I could, nothing came up.

Until now. Reading for a class assignment I ran across the following quote in a communication theory book.

If a man were permitted to make all the ballads, he need not care who should make the laws of a nation. - Andrew Fletcher

At long last, I have found the quote, or at least a similar and official deviant. (Which is a shame, I would have like to take credit for the first one.)

At any rate, this saying is very controversial, but also expandable. Today could we change it to say

If a man were permitted to make all the TV shows, he need not care who should make the laws of a nation.

Or maybe not TV shows, maybe movies instead. Is this a legitimate claim? Are we shaped by media or do we shape the media?

On one hand, if we absorb what is put in front of us without a second thought, we become what we are told to become. But, as a consumer, we drive what is created. If no one watches a TV show, the company will stop producing the TV show. As a consumer body, we have control over what gets produced. The problem lies with apathy. If people don’t care what they are fed, or they don’t care what products are produced, they won’t have any say in their creation. Yet, if people do care they can make a change.

If everyone stopped eating food at McDonalds, we would collectively make McDonalds rethink their corporate strategy. But if no one cares what McDonalds does, they will have no reason to boycott. (Disclaimer: I am not anti McDonalds.)

Here is my point. Far too often the solution that is proposed is a change of policy, but often for true change to be enacted it means a change in behavior. And as the old adage goes: old habits die hard.

March 22nd, 2008 : Land of Chaos Redesign

LandofChaos.net, has been in much need of a complete overhaul and today I just sat down and did it.

I went out looking for inspiration at a number of different CSS gallery sites. As I looked I noticed a common theme throughout about 75% of them. They all had a logo in the top left corner and the main links were in the top right. This was what I was originally thinking for a design, but I wasn’t sure if I wanted to be so cliche.

I decided to be cliche, but give it my own “chaotic” twist. I thought it would be neat if the drop down logo sat at a slight angle, just enough so that it looked like it was on accident. I think I ended up with too much of an angle, but I decided to leave it. The other thing I thought would be neat to not have the main navigation menu line up. As I started playing around with it though, it looked to planned, like I had an artistic theme and not like it was annoyingly off kilter. So rather than try to set something up so it would be pixel perfect, I decided to go with a completely random method by setting up each menu item to be spaced a random distance from the top of the page. I toyed with some side-to-side randomness, but nothing worked quite how I wanted it.

Beyond that I moved a few links around and added a complete RSS feed of latest posts from the Land of Chaos Store, Apathetic Thursday, Blogging While Paused, Flickr and YouTube.

Let me know what you think of the new look.

March 18th, 2008 : Lack of Apathy in Government

I don’t like to dive into politics. I find politics to be a dreadfully obnoxious topic. Since it is convoluted and misrepresented by the media, it feels like a waste of my time. Anyone with any sense knows enough to think through the issues and come to a conclusion on their own. Those without sense are incapable of being taught, and in the end it always feels like preaching to the choir and nothing ever seems to change.

With the election approaching later this year, I figured that it would be good to know what the potential candidates are actually saying, that way when it is time to vote, I can make an informed decision.

But as I was looking over the positions and stances that these politicians hold, I can’t help but think that there isn’t enough apathy in our Government.

Let me explain.

The Math

First, we do some math. According to the US Census Bureau there are approximately 303,658,558 people in the United States. To make our life easier, let’s round that down to 300,000,000. So we have 300 million people living in the US. These 300 million people all come from different backgrounds, which ultimately means that there are 300 million different opinions on how government should operate. It is literally impossible to come up with a set of laws and regulations which will please all the people, all the time.

However, it would be possible to set a handful of rules and regulations which everyone could agree upon. Perhaps you could call these “inalienable rights” and they could involve things such as “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” It would also be beneficial to have a system of defense for everyone as well.

So now we have a system set up for protecting human rights, but life is still pretty chaotic, because nobody agrees on any other laws or rules. Logically, if we can’t define a set of laws to please 300 million people, we need to shrink the population size. If we divided up the 300 million people into smaller subgroups, we would have a better chance of finding a set of rules to which everyone could agree too. If we divide 300 million into say… 50 different parts, we have about 6 million people per part.

It’s still pretty hard to come up with a set of rules and policies that 6 million people can agree upon though, but it would be much easier than trying to please 300 million. With a group of 6 million people you could probably come up with a good set of rules concerning things like: punishment for violations of “inalienable rights” or save driving speed limits.

Now the neat thing about dividing up the 300 million people into 50 parts is that the end result is 50 different sets of laws and rules. This means that if someone is unsatisfied with the laws or rules that their “part” has decided upon, they can simple move to one of the other 49 parts which has a different set of rules. This allows for people to choose what laws they live under.

To truly make everyone happy, though, we have to shrink yet again. 6 million is a huge number of people to please, and there are still aspects of life which need some sort of regulation. If we break down 6 million people into, say, 500 subsegments, we end up with groups of about 12000 people.

I would claim it would be significantly easier to find a set of rules that 12000 people could agree with, as compared with 300 million people. Now these rules could easily cover things such as education standards and how to settle various domestic disputes.

Again, this is a really neat system, because we have 50 “parts” all divided into 500 “segments” which gives a total of 25000 different segments, all of which will inevitablely have a different set of policies. This means that if someone is not satisfied with the set of rules he is currently living under, he/she may move to a location where-in he/she is living under the set of rules he/she prefers.

Even 12000 people can be hard to manage, especially since this covers all groups of people both culturally and age wise as well. But breaking down this set of 12000 people into small groups of 2-7, we can be sure that they will all develop a set of rules they can all live by happily.

I think this is a really good idea, I think this could actually work. We could call the segments of 300 million, 6 million and 12 thousand, federal, state and local government respectively. (Groups of 2-7 people could be called “families”).

The Lack Of Apathy

It’s easy to see that the system of government in the United States has huge potential. The problem lies in trying to take duties that should be handled by state or local governments and hand them off to the federal government. Working with a smaller group of people can achieve a more efficient and productive results than trying to cram everyone into a “one size fits all” cookie cutter.

The Federal part of our government needs to be more apathetic when it comes to making laws that would affect the day to day lives of everyone in the nation. State governments need to stop handling issues that should really be locally governed. Families, especially parents, need to start taking charge or rules that they govern themselves by.

There are state senates trying to make laws concerning the sale of video games. I can understand why young children shouldn’t be exposed to violent and explicit games, but I don’t believe that it is the job of the government to enforce this. Even though I think that keeping young children (or even teenagers) from some of these games is a good cause, I don’t think it should be the responsibility of some older person I don’t even know who lives hundreds of miles away. The responsibility for why I as an adult watch should be mine. The person responsible for keeping my children (when I have children) from getting involved in bad things or terrible games is mine.

Government should not be SimCity. No one human in power should be micromanaging the lives of others. That’s the whole concept behind the “freedom of speech” and “pursuit of happiness.” It all comes down to the division and delegation of tasks to smaller groups. The whole concept of “global” (global village, global economy, United Nations) is very scary. With technology the world has become a great place where everyone can interact, all 6 billion of us. But making one set of laws to govern 6 billion people is not only impossible, but really stupid, because no one is going to be happy with the result.

Unfortunately there is no simple cure for this. Some people will disagree with my opinion, case and point, you can’t please everyone. The goal of the people who govern us is to please as many people as possible. Ideal this should be because they are there to serve us, but usually it’s because they want to get re-elected. But they can’t serve us, unless they know what we want. As a United States citizen it is a great privilege to be allowed to contact my representatives and tell them what I want. Voting is another great way to tell officials what I want. If no one says anything, then no one is going to be helped by the government.

It’s a big responsibility, to know what the issues are and to know where a politician stands on the issues, but it’s a big decision that needs to be made, and well worth the time and energy. Every vote counts.

March 3rd, 2008 : Best Video Games Ever

I had some time to think today and began to think about the video games that really rock my world. It is hard for me to choose my favorite video games, because I like several of them a lot and hold their potential values about equal in my mind. Some of it simply has to do with the mood I am in. But not only did I want to think about what video games I like, I wanted to look into why I like them so much and what it is that attracts my attention to them.

DISCLAIMER: This is me writing about my opinion, which is inherently bias. If your opinion differs from mine that is perfectly all right, and I would be glad to hear what you think, however, please realize that I hold the right to reserve reading comments until Thursday.

The Legend of Zelda

The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past was one of the first video games I had as a child. We got our SNES a few months before the N64 came out. (With a promise to our parents that we wouldn’t also want the N64 because it was newer… which turned out to be completely false later.) A Link to the Past has a quality to it that few other games have. I think it has an amazing replay value. Not necessarily because there are different choices you can make, there really are not any choices, or because it has a hard mode, it doesn’t, but it has a unique quality of game play that makes it enjoyable to pick up and play every now and then.

The game has a really neat feel, there is something about a bird’s eye view or a two dimensional world which makes the game a joy to play. The music quality is rather crummy, but the melodies and notation are amazing. The controls are simple which is a major plus because there is no learning curve to just sit down and play. Battling is easy and most the bosses can be killed amazingly quickly as long as you are capable of sustaining a bunch of damage. This is a game I love to sit down and just run through. The Ocarina of Time is also on my list of awesome games. Living in a three dimensional world, being able to rome around, ride horses, explore caverns and take on a number of side quests made this game an absolute wonder. The music was wonderful and the puzzles that were presented in the dungeons made the game a great challenge.

I was put off by Majora’s Mask and I was never able to get myself into Wind Waker, although the music for Wind Waker was awesome. Twilight Princess was a joy to play through, the Wii’s controller gave the game a whole new feel and it was wonderful. I loved the music and the gameplay. The thing I didn’t like, though, was the locked in feeling I was always having. There were blocked passages that littered the map, limiting progress to only one direction. Even when I had finished the game I didn’t feel like I had a direct route to everywhere I wanted to go. I also felt like there weren’t as many side quests and that there was a tremendous amount of unused territory on the map. Playing through the game again may give me a better chance to explore, but until then I don’t know if I’m entirely satisfied.

Metroid

I love metroids. I don’t know why, but I’m actually in the processes of trying to create a metroid screen saver wherein several metroids will roam around my screen guarding my computer from any intruders. (More on this on this later.)

As with Zelda, my first Metroid encounter occurred long after Metroid had been released. We borrowed the game from my cousins who are several years older than myself and after playing the game for awhile we succeeded in erasing their saved data by leaving the cartridge in the Nintendo for too long. Since then I have purchased my own copy of Super Metroid and I still find it to be one of my favorite games. I love the music, the control style and the gameplay as a whole. The maps and the world are fascinating and there is a great potential for exploring and searching out secret upgrades.

I am of the opinion that the Metroid Prime series was also very well done. The first is my favorite in terms of music, plot, etc, the problem I have with it is the control scheme. When I first played it I had not big problems with the control scheme, but since then I have played more first person shooter games which have the dual control stick scheme. That is, looking and walking are controlled separately whereas Metroid had then controlled together.

I played through Metroid Prime three or four times and have always been meaning to go back and play through it again, trying for a low percent walkthrough, or at least try to get the high jump boots first. (I did once and haven’t been able to since.) I have only played through the two following Metroid games once a piece, since school has not allowed much of a break to go back and play. As a result I don’t know them as well as I know the first one, which also makes me not like them as much.

Metroid Prime 3 is my favorite in terms of control style and the music was good too, but I find that the bosses were far too easy. The disadvantage I had with Prime 3 was that I had to put it down for a month due to school and so I had to pick up the game midway and try to remember what I had done. For this reason alone it is on my list of games I need to run through again.

Mario Kart

My life would not be complete without Mario Kart. I could play Mario Kart for hours, and for that matter, on occasion, I have. The racing style of Mario Kart is perfect, the items allow anyone to have a fair chance (well… sort of…) and the variety of tracks and battles keep things interesting.

Going back to the Super Nintendo it is hard to imagine ever enjoying the choppy screen of bad textures which holds a great potential for giving seizures. Nonetheless, I’ll always remember having battles at my friends house and getting that feather so I could jump over the bump into the water, where I could sit until someone chased me out.

Mario Kart for the 64 is still a game I love to play, despite the fact that multi-player has all sorts of sound related issues. The tracks were fun and the cheats were great when you could get them. Favorite track is Rainbow Road,of course (pun intended). Double Dash provided a whole new aspect of racing which I have found to be both a blessing and hinderance at times. I love racing on my own, but having a partner help is a special challenge that is fun to take on from time to time. The graphics are better, there are more courses and more drivers and the music is fantastic.

Kirby’s Avalanche

I don’t know what it is about Kirby’s Avalanche, but I just can’t play enough of it. My biggest problem is finding people to play against. Everyone I know either doesn’t find it nearly as fun as I do or gets tired of being pummeled multiple times over, despite the fact I am playing with a seemingly enormous handicap. The hard part is beating the computers, who have a reflex ability that far surpasses mine.

Donkey Kong

Until recently my family’s Donkey Kong collection consisted of only Donkey Kong Country 3 and Donkey Kong 64. I have finally been able to produce Donkey Kong Country 1 and 2 from ebay and am in the process of working through the second one with my brother. I love the scrolling style of this game, which is something that is not found anywhere anymore.Donkey Kong 64 was a great game as well and has some great music that I really don’t listen too enough. To be honest, I never actually got to beat the game because our game data was erased by a neighbor kid before we finished it and we never started it back up.

Others

I love MegaMan, but never actually bought any of the games. Only rented them and downloaded their soundtracks. Kirby always had great games and I’ve purchased the old ones for the Wii now. Smash Bros is a great series that has offered weeks of great fun with friends. Perfect Dark was by far the best first person shooter for the N64. Beetle Adventure Racing was pretty sweet and while I’m thinking about racing games the original F-Zero is on my list of games I enjoy to sit down and play every now and then. Star Fox is a great series too, but I haven’t played the newest ones a whole lot. I enjoy the occasional jaunt into Halo, but more often then not I’m just listening to their soundtracks. Final Fantasy VII is a classic and one of these days I’ll remember that I still have to fight the final boss. Sim City for the Super Nintendo is the best Sim City game ever except that our cartridge was rather fickle and we were never able to keep a city going for very long before the data was erased. Of course, I can’t leave out Mario World Series and Super Mario 64.

The Why

The big theme that I see running through these games are the soundtracks. Almost all the games I like have a great soundtrack, most have good gameplay and at least some sort of replay value. I just wish I had more time to play some of these old games to see if they are still as good as I remember.

Anyway, those are the games I like. What do you say?

February 25th, 2008 : From the “Why on Earth?” files

Just picked up on this quote today from techdirt:

Anne Sweeney, the president of the Disney-ABC television group, claims: “You don’t need TiVo if you have fast-forward-disabled video on demand. It gives you the same opportunity to catch up to your favorite shows.”

I’m willing to bed that Anne doesn’t watch much TV. As far as I’m concerned the commercials on TV are getting worse not better, and seeing as the television programing isn’t much better, there really isn’t much point to watch TV, except for a handful of shows which are on once a week, and will be on DVD in another 6 months… commercial free.

But what makes even less sense, is that on Anne Sweeney’s bio page there is a link to a 300dpi profile photo. (It’s not just her, the other team members have this as well, but if you ask me, it’s weird. Although, the quality and clarity of the photo is quite amazing… …)

January 1st, 2008 : 18000 Photos and Counting

Morning GloryI like taking pictures. Too much so. I got my first digital camera in early 2004 and quickly took 1000+ or so photos over the next two years. (I think the actual number is a lot higher, but I can’t be sure anymore.) In 2006 I took 4000 photos and got my first DSLR camera. And in the following 12 months I took roughly 10000 photos.

This left me with about 18000 that were sitting on my computer, largely unsorted and sitting in iPhoto. I did do some work with my photos, but I never deleted any. I have hundreds of bad photos, some a blurry, many have poor composition and I find that there are far too many duplicates.

I needed to organize these photos. I needed to throw out the bad ones. I wanted to go through these photos, one by one, and save the good ones, getting rid of the bad ones, touching up the ones that needed to be touched up.

I had some options. All my photos were in iPhoto, I could take them all, tag them, rate them and set up smart albums and regular albums for them all. I had tried that a bit in the past from time to time and it never seemed worth my time. It was too clunky. It didn’t flow well and I had no starting place. Also, I was never quite sure if iPhoto really deleted my photo or not. Often I would delete a photo from an album only to remember that it was still present in my library. This was not a good solution.

I looked around for other programs that might do the job, but I never found anything that was quite to my satisfaction. So I had one option left: make my own.

So I began to think about the best way to go through and organize pictures. I didn’t want some proprietary format that I would have to keep buying upgrades for as my collection of photos increased or as time went on and it was upgraded. I also wanted to sort my photos by a single keyword, a simple dialog box which asked me for a name and then I could move on to the next photo.

SunriseI’m a fan of Applescript, which for those who don’t know is a easy to write programing language made by Apple which works with “many” of their programs. I know some other languages, but I don’t know enough about attaching them to interfaces and I didn’t want to take the time to learn, I just wanted to sort my photos.

My final solution turned out pretty well. I take all the photos I want sorted and dump them in an arbitrary folder. (The folder can’t contain other folders, but I’m still tweaking the code to fix these things.) Then I run my Applescript. It asks me to locate the folder of photos to be sorted and to locate a folder to sort the photos into. (I set up a folder called “Philip’s Photo Library” and sort them in there.) The program then runs through all the photos in the folder of unsorted photos, (opening them in Safari since Preview is not Applescript friendly) and then asks me to type in a name or category for the photo.

This is where things get a little tricky. If the photo I am looking at is a flower, not only do I want the program to move the photo to a folder called “Flower” but I probably also want to change the name of the photo to “Orchid” or whatever flower it happens to be. Whereas if the photo is some random photo from the family reunion I want the program to move the photo into a folder called “Family Reunion” and I don’t really care to name the image file.

To solve this I decided to have two options on my dialog box, one called “Name Image” and the other “Next Please”. If I choose “Name Image” I am presented with a second dialog box to change the image name and if I choose “Next Please” I just move onto the next photo and the picture file is automatically named from the first dialog box.

One of the first things I knew I needed to protect against was duplicate names. (I was fixing this before I had the two dialog box system as described above.) So I had the script count the number of photos already in the folder it was going to put the next picture, add one to the count and then put that number at the end of the name. When I added the second dialog box, I wondered if I should tweak this, since it wasn’t entirely necessary, (maybe use a different command, such as “move without replacing” or something) but I decided that my solution already worked and an arbitrary number at the end of the image name was no big problem to deal with. It would be fairly easy to get rid of later if I wanted too.

Stella de oro daylillyRight now I have used my script to sort through almost 1000 photos, I have deleted about 400 of the bad ones, and I now have roughly 10000 left to go through. I feel like this is finally under control. (Or at least able to get under control.)

My next issue is tackling my work flow for working with RAW format photos. I have started taking photos with RAW format which means they need to be processed before most applications can use them. They are also a lot larger in size. So I can’t let them accumulate because I will run out of hard drive space.

Also I need to start up my panoramic work again. A good 3000 of my photos are all for panoramic work. I have 100+ panoramic that I need to splice together. I’m just glad I have tools to help me do that.

Finally, though, I am working on cleaning up and debugging my applescript code so that it is more robust, then I plan to post it up to my website in case anyone else would be interested in this type of photo sorting solution. In the long run I think it would be nice to add an interface to the app, simply because the dialog box always pops up in front of the photo I am trying to look at, but also because I don’t want it to have to rely on Safari. If anyone would be interested in the code, let me know an I can post it up. It’s not as robust as I would like yet, but I’m willing to let it be open sourced. (I should really clean up my Applescript first though.)

Have a happy new year and may your photos all be sorted this year.

December 29th, 2007 : Losing Track of Time

PikminMy brother made the suggestion the other day that we sell a bunch of our old Game Cube games that we never play anymore. This would not only provide a small amount for the financing of more video games, but also clean up some shelf space in our gaming “cabinet.” So I agreed.

This meant that we had to look back on our games and find the ones that we didn’t play much. In the process we also got to see many games we once played for hours on end. Which meant we had to play some of them.

My brother started a game of Pikmin last night and after watching him play, I knew I had to, simply because I knew I could do better than he was doing. For those who aren’t familiar with Pikmin, they are small little plant-like creatures that spout from the ground, but when plucked out like carrots or oninons they they follow you around and carry things (like ants.) The premise of the game is that you are a small little “person” who’s spaceship crash-lands on a strange planet and you need the help of the Pikmin to get you ship’s parts back.

Anyway, I started up a new game last night around 7:00, thinking I would play for a short bit and then go play cards or watch a movie with my family. So I play through the first several days of the game, and then I take a look at my watch. It’s 9:50. I was utterly shocked, I had no idea that much time had just flown past. Granted, I was well into my game, but I totally lost track of time.

So I thought I would play a few more levels and be done. What seemed like a few minutes or so later my mom walks into the room and tells my brother to go to bed because it’s after 11. In fact, it’s closer to 11:30.

The last time I lost track of that much time I was asleep.

Part of the problem is that my room has no visible clock. All my clocks are found on things like my watch, my cell phone, my laptop, my stereo (if it’s in standby but then you have to press the clock button.) But I think more of the fact was simply the game I was playing.

With Pikmin, you are seriously multi-tasking. I usually had at least two groups of Pikmin doing things at any given time. One group would break down a wall and another group would carry back a part to the ship and I would have a third group fight a bunch of enemies so I could get another part. It’s really a multi-tasking game.

Right now, I’m on day 18 or so and I have all the parts but one. (For some reason [I don't remember why...] you are limited to 30 days to get all the parts. [There are 30 parts.] I got all the parts (but one) in 16 days and could have just gone to the final boss to get the last part, but I decided I would spend my remaining 13 or so days just getting as many Pikmin as I can.

I had to pry myself away from the game this morning to get some other stuff done, just hard to think how addictive that game is. Great game though, if you’ve got time to kill.

December 18th, 2007 : Facebook Comments

I usually don’t get many comments on my blog, but recently I have had people making a number comments on my sanity equation posts. This was quite neat, but I ran into the issue that many of the comments were being made on the Facebook side of the web. (All of my blog posts are pulled into Facebook as “Notes” via RSS.)  This was all good and fine but it makes it so that people who don’t read my stuff on Facebook miss out on the comments that are made.

I found a solution, however. I installed a plugin on my blog which grabs comments from Facebook and places them in my blog. Now everyone who visits http://apatheticthursday.net can see all the comments that are made on my blog posts, whether they are on Facebook or not.

Facebook people? Yeah, I don’t really care if you can see all the comments on a post or not.