<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This still bothers me</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/</link>
	<description>...and you thought casual friday was fun...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-997</guid>
		<description>Okay, first off, &quot;Song are known for being vague.&quot; That is an unsubstantiated statement. I for one did not know songs were known for being vague. I know plenty of songs that are not vague.

Secondly, my case is not against the character of Joan of Arc. It&#039;s about her beauty. I&#039;m still not convinced that he is talking about something besides beauty in the line. It doesn&#039;t make sense to me.

It was also pointed out to me that the majority of males equate the word lovely with beauty the majority of the time. Since this song was written/sung by a male, it seems logical that beauty was the main thought. (Plus, throwing a character reference between two highly known beauty references is bad writing.)

Therefore, I have to thank you both for your input, but I&#039;m not convinced that Joan of Arc can/should be put on the same plane as Cleopatra or Aphrodite.

What&#039;s more, I have a theory with two options: 

Option 1: Tal Bachman doesn&#039;t have the faintest clue who Joan of Arc is, but just grabbed her name because she is well known in history and fit the syllable length for the song.

Option 2: Tal Bachman saw a play/movie of Joan of Arc and after seeing a beautiful actress play the part, assumed that the real Joan of Arc was also very pretty.

A few other people I have talked to think these are plausible explanations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, first off, &#8220;Song are known for being vague.&#8221; That is an unsubstantiated statement. I for one did not know songs were known for being vague. I know plenty of songs that are not vague.</p>
<p>Secondly, my case is not against the character of Joan of Arc. It&#8217;s about her beauty. I&#8217;m still not convinced that he is talking about something besides beauty in the line. It doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
<p>It was also pointed out to me that the majority of males equate the word lovely with beauty the majority of the time. Since this song was written/sung by a male, it seems logical that beauty was the main thought. (Plus, throwing a character reference between two highly known beauty references is bad writing.)</p>
<p>Therefore, I have to thank you both for your input, but I&#8217;m not convinced that Joan of Arc can/should be put on the same plane as Cleopatra or Aphrodite.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, I have a theory with two options: </p>
<p>Option 1: Tal Bachman doesn&#8217;t have the faintest clue who Joan of Arc is, but just grabbed her name because she is well known in history and fit the syllable length for the song.</p>
<p>Option 2: Tal Bachman saw a play/movie of Joan of Arc and after seeing a beautiful actress play the part, assumed that the real Joan of Arc was also very pretty.</p>
<p>A few other people I have talked to think these are plausible explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1116</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-1116</guid>
		<description>Okay, first off, &quot;Song are known for being vague.&quot; That is an unsubstantiated statement. I for one did not know songs were known for being vague. I know plenty of songs that are not vague.

Secondly, my case is not against the character of Joan of Arc. It&#039;s about her beauty. I&#039;m still not convinced that he is talking about something besides beauty in the line. It doesn&#039;t make sense to me.

It was also pointed out to me that the majority of males equate the word lovely with beauty the majority of the time. Since this song was written/sung by a male, it seems logical that beauty was the main thought. (Plus, throwing a character reference between two highly known beauty references is bad writing.)

Therefore, I have to thank you both for your input, but I&#039;m not convinced that Joan of Arc can/should be put on the same plane as Cleopatra or Aphrodite.

What&#039;s more, I have a theory with two options: 

Option 1: Tal Bachman doesn&#039;t have the faintest clue who Joan of Arc is, but just grabbed her name because she is well known in history and fit the syllable length for the song.

Option 2: Tal Bachman saw a play/movie of Joan of Arc and after seeing a beautiful actress play the part, assumed that the real Joan of Arc was also very pretty.

A few other people I have talked to think these are plausible explanations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, first off, &#8220;Song are known for being vague.&#8221; That is an unsubstantiated statement. I for one did not know songs were known for being vague. I know plenty of songs that are not vague.</p>
<p>Secondly, my case is not against the character of Joan of Arc. It&#8217;s about her beauty. I&#8217;m still not convinced that he is talking about something besides beauty in the line. It doesn&#8217;t make sense to me.</p>
<p>It was also pointed out to me that the majority of males equate the word lovely with beauty the majority of the time. Since this song was written/sung by a male, it seems logical that beauty was the main thought. (Plus, throwing a character reference between two highly known beauty references is bad writing.)</p>
<p>Therefore, I have to thank you both for your input, but I&#8217;m not convinced that Joan of Arc can/should be put on the same plane as Cleopatra or Aphrodite.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, I have a theory with two options: </p>
<p>Option 1: Tal Bachman doesn&#8217;t have the faintest clue who Joan of Arc is, but just grabbed her name because she is well known in history and fit the syllable length for the song.</p>
<p>Option 2: Tal Bachman saw a play/movie of Joan of Arc and after seeing a beautiful actress play the part, assumed that the real Joan of Arc was also very pretty.</p>
<p>A few other people I have talked to think these are plausible explanations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aunty diane</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>aunty diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-996</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a song. Songs are known for being vague. Joan of Arc is highly revered especailly in the catholic church- I think she is even elevated to sainhood there hence the unabtainable goal of being worthy.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a song. Songs are known for being vague. Joan of Arc is highly revered especailly in the catholic church- I think she is even elevated to sainhood there hence the unabtainable goal of being worthy&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aunty diane</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>aunty diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s a song. Songs are known for being vague. Joan of Arc is highly revered especailly in the catholic church- I think she is even elevated to sainhood there hence the unabtainable goal of being worthy.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a song. Songs are known for being vague. Joan of Arc is highly revered especailly in the catholic church- I think she is even elevated to sainhood there hence the unabtainable goal of being worthy&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-995</guid>
		<description>You make a good case for the word lovely not meaning &quot;beauty&quot; but you stop short in explaining how this actually fits into the song.

Is he praising Joan of Arc&#039;s character? The beauty of her heart or mind? Her ability to rise up and cause a revolution? (And then get burned at the stake?)

If that&#039;s the case perhaps he is talking about Aphrodite&#039;s *beautiful* heart and mind. 

I&#039;m not saying that each character can&#039;t stand for something else, but typically if you use three people as examples either all three of them represent the same thing, or they each will represent something different that is equally important.

In this case, the bookends, Cleopatra and Aphrodite are both widely (read: only) known for their beauty. (Although Aphrodite is also known for being a Greek goddess, which implies a whole different line of undesirable characteristic.)

Joan of Arc is the only one who is not known for her beauty. Instead she is known for causing an uprising (which didn&#039;t turn out terribly well for her.)

I&#039;m not convinced that telling someone they are &quot;like Joan of Arc&quot; is a compliment. And telling someone they are better than Joan of Arc is only marginally better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good case for the word lovely not meaning &#8220;beauty&#8221; but you stop short in explaining how this actually fits into the song.</p>
<p>Is he praising Joan of Arc&#8217;s character? The beauty of her heart or mind? Her ability to rise up and cause a revolution? (And then get burned at the stake?)</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case perhaps he is talking about Aphrodite&#8217;s *beautiful* heart and mind. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that each character can&#8217;t stand for something else, but typically if you use three people as examples either all three of them represent the same thing, or they each will represent something different that is equally important.</p>
<p>In this case, the bookends, Cleopatra and Aphrodite are both widely (read: only) known for their beauty. (Although Aphrodite is also known for being a Greek goddess, which implies a whole different line of undesirable characteristic.)</p>
<p>Joan of Arc is the only one who is not known for her beauty. Instead she is known for causing an uprising (which didn&#8217;t turn out terribly well for her.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that telling someone they are &#8220;like Joan of Arc&#8221; is a compliment. And telling someone they are better than Joan of Arc is only marginally better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>You make a good case for the word lovely not meaning &quot;beauty&quot; but you stop short in explaining how this actually fits into the song.

Is he praising Joan of Arc&#039;s character? The beauty of her heart or mind? Her ability to rise up and cause a revolution? (And then get burned at the stake?)

If that&#039;s the case perhaps he is talking about Aphrodite&#039;s *beautiful* heart and mind. 

I&#039;m not saying that each character can&#039;t stand for something else, but typically if you use three people as examples either all three of them represent the same thing, or they each will represent something different that is equally important.

In this case, the bookends, Cleopatra and Aphrodite are both widely (read: only) known for their beauty. (Although Aphrodite is also known for being a Greek goddess, which implies a whole different line of undesirable characteristic.)

Joan of Arc is the only one who is not known for her beauty. Instead she is known for causing an uprising (which didn&#039;t turn out terribly well for her.)

I&#039;m not convinced that telling someone they are &quot;like Joan of Arc&quot; is a compliment. And telling someone they are better than Joan of Arc is only marginally better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good case for the word lovely not meaning &#8220;beauty&#8221; but you stop short in explaining how this actually fits into the song.</p>
<p>Is he praising Joan of Arc&#8217;s character? The beauty of her heart or mind? Her ability to rise up and cause a revolution? (And then get burned at the stake?)</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s the case perhaps he is talking about Aphrodite&#8217;s *beautiful* heart and mind. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that each character can&#8217;t stand for something else, but typically if you use three people as examples either all three of them represent the same thing, or they each will represent something different that is equally important.</p>
<p>In this case, the bookends, Cleopatra and Aphrodite are both widely (read: only) known for their beauty. (Although Aphrodite is also known for being a Greek goddess, which implies a whole different line of undesirable characteristic.)</p>
<p>Joan of Arc is the only one who is not known for her beauty. Instead she is known for causing an uprising (which didn&#8217;t turn out terribly well for her.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that telling someone they are &#8220;like Joan of Arc&#8221; is a compliment. And telling someone they are better than Joan of Arc is only marginally better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cousin Re-Re</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Cousin Re-Re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-993</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think lovely necessarily means beauty.

–adjective
1. 	charmingly or exquisitely beautiful: a lovely flower.
2. 	having a beauty that appeals to the heart or mind as well as to the eye, as a person or a face.
3. 	delightful; highly pleasing: to have a lovely time.
4. 	of a great moral or spiritual beauty: a lovely character.
–noun
5. 	Informal. a beautiful woman, esp. a show girl.
6. 	any person or thing that is pleasing, highly satisfying, or the like: Every car in the new line is a lovely.
–adverb
7. 	Nonstandard. very well; splendidly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think lovely necessarily means beauty.</p>
<p>–adjective<br />
1. 	charmingly or exquisitely beautiful: a lovely flower.<br />
2. 	having a beauty that appeals to the heart or mind as well as to the eye, as a person or a face.<br />
3. 	delightful; highly pleasing: to have a lovely time.<br />
4. 	of a great moral or spiritual beauty: a lovely character.<br />
–noun<br />
5. 	Informal. a beautiful woman, esp. a show girl.<br />
6. 	any person or thing that is pleasing, highly satisfying, or the like: Every car in the new line is a lovely.<br />
–adverb<br />
7. 	Nonstandard. very well; splendidly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cousin Re-Re</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1113</link>
		<dc:creator>Cousin Re-Re</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-1113</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think lovely necessarily means beauty.

–adjective
1. 	charmingly or exquisitely beautiful: a lovely flower.
2. 	having a beauty that appeals to the heart or mind as well as to the eye, as a person or a face.
3. 	delightful; highly pleasing: to have a lovely time.
4. 	of a great moral or spiritual beauty: a lovely character.
–noun
5. 	Informal. a beautiful woman, esp. a show girl.
6. 	any person or thing that is pleasing, highly satisfying, or the like: Every car in the new line is a lovely.
–adverb
7. 	Nonstandard. very well; splendidly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think lovely necessarily means beauty.</p>
<p>–adjective<br />
1. 	charmingly or exquisitely beautiful: a lovely flower.<br />
2. 	having a beauty that appeals to the heart or mind as well as to the eye, as a person or a face.<br />
3. 	delightful; highly pleasing: to have a lovely time.<br />
4. 	of a great moral or spiritual beauty: a lovely character.<br />
–noun<br />
5. 	Informal. a beautiful woman, esp. a show girl.<br />
6. 	any person or thing that is pleasing, highly satisfying, or the like: Every car in the new line is a lovely.<br />
–adverb<br />
7. 	Nonstandard. very well; splendidly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s the most plausible explanation I&#039;ve heard and I can see that argument, but the refrain is implying that beauty is one of the main issues, as seen with the use of the word &quot;lovely&quot; and the choice examples of two of the most lovely women in history. That said, he could have picked better examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s the most plausible explanation I&#8217;ve heard and I can see that argument, but the refrain is implying that beauty is one of the main issues, as seen with the use of the word &#8220;lovely&#8221; and the choice examples of two of the most lovely women in history. That said, he could have picked better examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philip</title>
		<link>http://apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/comment-page-1/#comment-1112</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apatheticthursday.net/?p=502#comment-1112</guid>
		<description>Well, that&#039;s the most plausible explanation I&#039;ve heard and I can see that argument, but the refrain is implying that beauty is one of the main issues, as seen with the use of the word &quot;lovely&quot; and the choice examples of two of the most lovely women in history. That said, he could have picked better examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that&#8217;s the most plausible explanation I&#8217;ve heard and I can see that argument, but the refrain is implying that beauty is one of the main issues, as seen with the use of the word &#8220;lovely&#8221; and the choice examples of two of the most lovely women in history. That said, he could have picked better examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  apatheticthursday.net/2009/09/12/this-still-bothers-me/feed/ ) in 0.24675 seconds, on May 19th, 2012 at 12:14 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 19th, 2012 at 1:14 pm UTC -->
